The Questions  ·  the method · analogy

When does a comparison actually prove something?

Every argument leans on a parallel somewhere. Almost nobody checks the one they are leaning on, and there is a test that takes about a second.

If it is a true parallel it runs backwards as cleanly as forwards.

Either it reverses or it is trash.

How cleanly does it run backwards? Does B bring you back to A just as clean?

What this settles

Which converts a matter of taste into a check anybody can run. A pretty comparison carries you one way and collapses on the return trip. A real one is the same road in both directions — and that is the whole difference between an argument and a decoration.

Also asked as

Where this is worked out

dialogue

When Does a Comparison Actually Prove Something?

Items without a link are sessions, shorts, strand reads or frameworks that live as video or audio rather than as pages. Everything Philosophy Zero puts out is listed on the Shelf.

Nothing on this page is composed. Every sentence in the answer is drawn from the pieces listed above. Where a claim is compressed, it is compressed from one of them and adds nothing they do not say.

Where this question sits

The parallel

When a comparison proves something and when it only decorates — the reversal test, and what a definition is underneath. 1 of the 2 here have been worked through; the rest are on the map and not yet walked.

← All the questions